Decolonising the Curriculum in Theory and Practice - 10 May 2017 - Decolonising STEM
Duration: 1 hour 48 mins
Share this media item:
Embed this media item:
Embed this media item:
About this item
| Description: |
Speakers
Professor Chanda Prescod-Weinstein (University of Washington, Seattle) Undefining Black Women Scientists: Past, Present and Future Dr Arianne Shahvisi (University of Sussex) This panel will take the debate on decolonising the curriculum to STEM subjects, asking whether the basic axioms of scientific objectivity need rethinking when they are premised on the marginalisation of subaltern people from STEM. From this premise follows the axiom that the subaltern can be a subject of research, but it cannot itself research. Can science be objective when the language embedded in it works to 'unconstruct' Black and Indigenous women (and more broadly other minoritised peoples) as physicists? How might we develop a heuristic for disrupting problematic explanations and generalisations, and thereby refuse to be complicit in them? Abstracts Professor Prescod-Weinstein Undefining Black Women Scientists: Past, Present and Future To constitute a concept of 'physics community', physicists assume two foundational axioms. First, the laws of physics are independent of cognitive inference/interference, and, second, that they are unchanging or only evolving according to their own rules. This leads to the axion that the subaltern can be a subject of research, but it cannot itself research. Can science be objective when the language embedded in it works to 'unconstruct' Black and Indigenous women (and more broadly other minoritided peoples) as physicists? Dr Shahvisi Using tools from the philosophy of science to examine the nature of explanations she asks how easily they lead us towards generalisations we should instead be equipping ourselves to resist (i.e. generalisations which are racist and/or sexist). |
|---|
| Created: | 2017-05-15 10:57 |
|---|---|
| Collection: | Decolonising the Curriculum in Theory and Practice |
| Publisher: | University of Cambridge |
| Copyright: | Glenn Jobson |
| Language: | eng (English) |
| Keywords: | Chanda Prescod-Weinstein; Arianne Shahvisi; Decolonising the Curriculum in Theory and Practice; CRASSH; |
| Abstract: | Speakers
Professor Chanda Prescod-Weinstein (University of Washington, Seattle) Undefining Black Women Scientists: Past, Present and Future Dr Arianne Shahvisi (University of Sussex) This panel will take the debate on decolonising the curriculum to STEM subjects, asking whether the basic axioms of scientific objectivity need rethinking when they are premised on the marginalisation of subaltern people from STEM. From this premise follows the axiom that the subaltern can be a subject of research, but it cannot itself research. Can science be objective when the language embedded in it works to 'unconstruct' Black and Indigenous women (and more broadly other minoritised peoples) as physicists? How might we develop a heuristic for disrupting problematic explanations and generalisations, and thereby refuse to be complicit in them? Abstracts Professor Prescod-Weinstein Undefining Black Women Scientists: Past, Present and Future To constitute a concept of 'physics community', physicists assume two foundational axioms. First, the laws of physics are independent of cognitive inference/interference, and, second, that they are unchanging or only evolving according to their own rules. This leads to the axion that the subaltern can be a subject of research, but it cannot itself research. Can science be objective when the language embedded in it works to 'unconstruct' Black and Indigenous women (and more broadly other minoritided peoples) as physicists? Dr Shahvisi Using tools from the philosophy of science to examine the nature of explanations she asks how easily they lead us towards generalisations we should instead be equipping ourselves to resist (i.e. generalisations which are racist and/or sexist). |
|---|---|