Engaging Citizens in Questions of Health and Data Privacy

21 mins 52 secs, 83.64 MB, iPod Video 480x270, 29.97 fps, 44100 Hz, 522.25 kbits/sec

Share this media item:

Embed this media item:

<iframe width="_width_" height="_height_" src="https://sms.cam.ac.uk/media/2376412/embed" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Choose size:

About this item

Available Formats

About this item

Description:	Oswald, M (Citizens' Juries c.i.c) Tuesday 6th December 2016 - 11:50 to 12:10


Created:	2016-12-13 14:33
Collection:	Newton Gateway to Mathematics
Publisher:	Isaac Newton Institute
Copyright:	Oswald, M
Language:	eng (English)


Abstract:	Malcolm Oswald PhD is Director of social enterprise Citizens Juries c.i.c., and an Honorary Research Fellow in Law at the University of Manchester. He has worked for many years on information governance in the NHS, including developing NHS guidance on anonymisation. He will talk about two citizens’ juries designed and run by the University of Manchester, and the significance of these for public policy. The juries explored questions about whether health data derived from patient records should be used for purposes such as research and clinical audit, but also more contentious uses of such data by commercial organisations e.g. for new drug discovery. Each jury brought together a cross-section of citizens, 18 in each jury, to hear evidence from expert witnesses. An independent oversight panel monitored for bias. The juries deliberated together over 3 days, to reach conclusions about the questions they were set.

Abstract:

Malcolm Oswald PhD is Director of social enterprise Citizens Juries c.i.c., and an Honorary Research Fellow in Law at the University of Manchester. He has worked for many years on information governance in the NHS, including developing NHS guidance on anonymisation.
He will talk about two citizens’ juries designed and run by the University of Manchester, and the significance of these for public policy. The juries explored questions about whether health data derived from patient records should be used for purposes such as research and clinical audit, but also more contentious uses of such data by commercial organisations e.g. for new drug discovery. Each jury brought together a cross-section of citizens, 18 in each jury, to hear evidence from expert witnesses. An independent oversight panel monitored for bias. The juries deliberated together over 3 days, to reach conclusions about the questions they were set.

Available Formats

Format	Quality	Bitrate	Size
MPEG-4 Video	640x360	1.92 Mbits/sec	315.97 MB	View	Download
WebM	640x360	469.09 kbits/sec	75.13 MB	View	Download
iPod Video *	480x270	522.25 kbits/sec	83.64 MB	View	Download
MP3	44100 Hz	249.81 kbits/sec	40.04 MB	Listen	Download
Auto	(Allows browser to choose a format it supports)